作为 20 世纪后期兴起的学术领域,离散研究原本专注犹太人的流散处境。随着近代人口的大规模移徙与后殖民理论的兴起,这一语汇的对象逐渐扩展,并延伸至族裔冲突与融合的文化问题。在当代美学领域,“离散” 所牵涉的对象多为黑人文化。但 “离散” 一词在华人文化研究中并不鲜见,早期多见于海外华人学者专事的华语语系研究,近来也在艺术领域被频繁提及。现在看来,离散族群可以被宽泛地理解为 “居住在祖国以外的族裔群体”。1 离散文化象征着重新整合,适用于世界各地的离散群体,无论他们如何接受寓居地的文化传统。它代表了一种非某个民族或社会所独有的艺术实践复合体。“离散美学” 被学者李有成解读为 “一种混杂、错置、含混与差异的美学”2,它对视觉呈现中的混杂性与身份认同的呼唤及回应都予以特殊关注,因此可能松动正统艺术史裹挟的美学次序。
As an academic field that emerged in the late 20th century, diaspora studies originally focused on the Jewish diaspora. However, with the large-scale migration of populations and the rise of postcolonial theory in modern times, the scope of this term has gradually expanded to include cultural issues related to ethnic conflicts and cultural integration. In contemporary aesthetics, the subjects involved in “diaspora” are often associated with black culture. However, the term “diaspora” is not uncommon in Chinese cultural studies, where it was initially prevalent in research by overseas Chinese scholars on Sinophone studies and has recently been frequently mentioned in the field of art as well. Today, diasporic groups can be broadly understood as “ethnic communities living outside their homeland.”1 Diasporic culture symbolises a reintegration process and applies to diasporic groups worldwide, regardless of how they adopt the cultural traditions of their places of residence. It represents a complex of artistic practices not exclusive to any nationality or society. “Diasporic aesthetics” has been interpreted by Taiwanese scholar Li Youcheng as “an aesthetics of hybridity, displacement, ambiguity, and difference,”2 paying particular attention to hybridity in visual presentation and the call for and response to identity, thus potentially loosening the aesthetic order that orthodox art history seeks to impose.
可见与不可见性
Visibility and Invisibility
英国艺术史学者科贝纳・默瑟(Kobena Mercer)就在其专著中提供了一种非白人中心的现代艺术史叙事。他表明对可见性政治的质疑有助于我们理解离散文化的复杂历史与未来。1 今年的威尼斯双年展或许是与此信念最近的一次实践。以 “处处都是外人”(Foreigners Everywhere)为题,关注包括流离失所者、难民、移民与性少数等群体,展览试图将曾被边缘化的群体带到视域中心,质询可见与不可见的辩证关系,并提醒我们:展览伦理不仅关乎在场的视觉政治,也与因故缺席的种种相关。参展艺术家名单包括了如潘玉良(b.1895,扬州)与张荔英(Georgette Chen,b.1906,浙江)两位曾经不那么为人熟知的华人女性艺术家。
二者都成长于民国时代,但因为各自的命运而成为第一代海外移民。她们的创作经历五四运动、妇女解放运动与东西美术相交的洗礼,然而由于自身的性别身份与动荡历史,鲜见于大多艺术史叙述。潘玉良先后在法国与意大利留学,并曾在上海美专执教,于中年旅居法国直到逝世。在接受西方现代主义绘画教育之后,潘的作品既有着印象派、野兽派与学院派的痕迹,也不乏白描与彩墨画等中国绘画形式。她甚至被陈独秀认为是将国画线性语言与西画塑形逻辑相融合的典范。而出生于优渥家境的张荔英,自小就体验着跨国跨文化的生活。在艺术求学方面,她曾短暂地在纽约学习后前往巴黎,并于 1930 年入选一年一度的巴黎秋季艺术沙龙(Salon d’Automne)。她那一时期的绘画显示出明显的后印象派风格,但也因为画面中的东方元素受到 “自我东方主义” 的质疑。2 在她被蓬皮杜艺术中心收藏的作品《风景》(Paysage,1930)中,塞尚式的画面与中国山水的构图相协调,背景的淡青色远山则出现类似 “渲染” 的技法。这件作品后来也出现在新加坡国立美术馆与蓬皮杜联合策划的展览 “重构现代主义”(Reframing Modernism,2016)中,此主题恰恰呼应了默瑟在论述离散美学时所强调的观点:“现代主义从来都是多元文化的”3。
第一代女性移民艺术家既充当着中国与西方文化对话的中介,又由于现代性显现出多重的 “他者” 身份。因此,她们的创作不仅透露出双重意识,还涉及多维的互动与交织,尽管这些交互并不平等。少数总是容易被排除在外。对默瑟而言,这种情况在现代主义艺术中尤为如此,因其核心价值观 —— 独创、僭越与统一的作者身份 —— 就是基于非此即彼的逻辑,这造就了艺术史图景的高光与阴影。如果说中国艺术家已经是在现代艺术史中被边缘化的群体,那么中国女性绘画史恰如艺术史家陶咏白所言,是一部彻底 “失落的历史”。
Kobena Mercer, Travel & See: Black Diaspora Art Practices since the 1980s, New York, USA: Duke University Press, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822374510 ↩
蔡珩,《跨文化语境下的张荔英早期艺术实践研究》,《美术观察》2024 年第 3 期,第 74–76 页。 ↩
Mercer Kobena, “12. Diaspora Aesthetics and Visual Culture”, Travel & See: Black Diaspora Art Practices since the 1980s, New York, USA: Duke University Press, 2016, pp. 227–247 https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822374510-015 ↩
British art historian Kobena Mercer provides his writings with a non-white-centric narrative of modern art history. He argues that questioning the politics of visibility helps us understand the complex history and future of diasporic culture1. This belief was perhaps most recently exemplified at this year’s Venice Biennale. The exhibition, “Foreigners Everywhere”, focused on displaced persons, refugees, immigrants, and sexual minorities, aiming to bring previously marginalised groups into the centre of the visual field. It addresses the dialectical relationship between visibility and invisibility and reminds us that the ethics of exhibitions concern not only the politics of visibility but also the absences caused by various reasons. The list of participating artists included two less-known Chinese female artists, Pan Yuliang (b.1895, Yangzhou) and Georgette Chen (b.1906, Zhejiang).
Both grew up during the Republican era but became first-generation immigrants due to their destinies. Because of their gender identity and turbulent history, they are rarely mentioned in most art history narratives. However, having experienced the May Fourth Movement, the women’s liberation movement, and the confluence of Eastern and Western art, their creations deserve attention. Pan Yuliang studied in France and Italy and later taught at the Shanghai Academy of Fine Arts. She sojourned in France from middle age until her death. After receiving an education in Western modernist painting, Pan’s works show traces of Impressionism, Fauvism, and Academicism, as well as Chinese painting forms such as “baimiao” (white drawing) and coloured ink painting. Chinese revolutionary socialist and philosopher Chen Duxiu even regarded her as a model of integrating the linear language of Chinese painting with the shaping logic of Western painting. Georgette Chen, born into a privileged life, experienced a transnational and cross-cultural life from an early age. In her artistic studies, she briefly studied in New York before going to Paris and was selected for the Salon d’Automne exhibition in 1930. Her paintings from that period display a clear Post-Impressionist style. Still, the Oriental elements in her works also led to criticisms of “self-Orientalism”2. In her work Paysage (1930), which is part of the collection of the Centre Pompidou, the Cézannesque impression harmonises with the composition of traditional Chinese landscapes. The light blue distant mountains in the background are rendered with a technique reminiscent of “xuanran” (ink rendering). This work later appeared in the joint exhibition “Reframing Modernism” (2016), co-curated by the National Gallery Singapore and the Centre Pompidou, echoing Mercer’s argument in his discussion of diasporic aesthetics: “Modernism was always multicultural”3.
As first-generation female immigrant artists, they acted as intermediaries between Chinese and Western cultures, but modernity also revealed their multiple otherness. Therefore, their creations not only present a dual consciousness but also involve multidimensional interactions and intersections, even though these interactions are not always equal. The marginalised are always easily excluded. According to Mercer, this situation is particularly evident in modernist art, as its core values—originality, transgression, and the unified oeuvre—are based on an either/or logic, depicting a landscape of highlights and shadows in art history. If Chinese artists are already marginalised in modern art history, then, as art historian Tao Yongbai stated, the history of Chinese female painters is a completely “lost history”.
Kobena Mercer, Travel & See: Black Diaspora Art Practices since the 1980s, New York, USA: Duke University Press, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822374510 ↩
Cai Heng, “A Study of Georgette Chen’s Early Artistic Practice in a Cross-Cultural Context”, Art Observation, No.3, 2024, pp. 74–76. Ibid: 227-247. ↩
Mercer Kobena, “12. Diaspora Aesthetics and Visual Culture”, Travel & See: Black Diaspora Art Practices since the 1980s, New York, USA: Duke University Press, 2016, pp. 227–247 https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822374510-015 ↩
此在他乡
No-Where
对于后来的离散艺术家而言,这种失落还意味着因时代特性雪上加霜的主体性失落,传统的归属成了一个永远无法尘埃落定的问题。阚萱(b.1972,宣城)在世纪之交的时刻,似乎就预感到即将到来的生存情境剧变。在《阚萱 哎!》(1999)中,她在北京最大的地铁交汇站通道穿梭,边跑边喊着自己的名字。这象征性的行为显然不仅预示了她后来的职业生涯,也成为离散艺术家们呼唤自我的群体写照。自 2002 年获得荷兰皇家艺术学院的驻地奖助金后,阚萱就开始穿梭于北京与阿姆斯特丹。她的创作主题也受到这些生活轨迹的影响:从早期对西方意识形态的摄入(《快乐女孩》,2002),到后来反思中西差异与全球化带来的贫富差异(《小岛》,2006–2009),再到后来对中国性的探询(《大谷子堆》,2012),都侧写出一个创作主体对他地文化的消化与吸收,并最终选择折返自我历史的过程。这正符合萨弗兰提出的 “离散” 特征,即从最初的地理迁徙,到对故乡的牵挂,后因无法完全融入宗主国而愈加与祖居地形成认同 1。
与阚萱同龄但作为次代移民生活于美国西岸的张怡(Patty Chang,b.1972,旧金山),则对自身的亚裔女性身份有着更长久的切身体验与思考。其早期录像《喷泉》(1999)直观地呈现出自我与他者的关系。她啜舔镜上水的行为,构成了一个主体与作为水中倒影的他者。如其所试图揭示的,人们总是需要透过饮用自我倒影(他者)以使自我变得完整。与初代移民不同,次代移民艺术家几乎是在充分意识到自身作为他者的情况下工作的。有时,这种把 “此在”(Dasein)认作他乡的意识也可以导向自我赋能,有助于艺术家将自身的他异性作为斗争的据点。如在《香格里拉》(2015)中,张怡前往云南藏区的小镇中甸(该地声称是小说《消失的地平线》中香格里拉的原型),以虚构叙事与写实摄影的手法,记录了自己与当地人完成的刻板印象式的作品。这种粗暴处理地方性文化与身份想象的方式,恰好刻画了她自身作为华人女性身份被戴上的形象面具,从而对他者的特殊性与具体性作出回应。
硕士毕业后旅居法国的 姚清妹(b.1982,温州)也熟稔于这样的身份策略。在《跳吧!跳吧!布鲁斯・玲》(2013)中,她身着李小龙的经典黄底黑条服,手持镰刀锤子在一个粗糙潦草的竹景图前表演,其间伴有她发出的打斗声与钢琴师演奏的电影配乐 “龙之怒”。行为录像记录了她对这一系列中国化符号的拼贴演绎,并以精疲力竭的倒地做结尾。符号的过剩与消解随着她的声乐余音缭绕于画面之中。如果说前述两件作品都还是以西方之他者的身份展开创作,那么《三足鼎及其鼎纹探究 —— 关于 “镰锤” 符号起源和发展的几种假设》(2013–至今)则是姚清妹作为原乡之他者的严肃杜撰。在这个长期的 “研究项目” 中,她扮演的 “姚教授” 对一个出土文物上出现的 “镰锤” 纹样展开一系列调查。如此,来自她原生意识形态环境中的象征符号被彻底对象化了,探究纹样历史的过程似乎也是她异化自身历史的尝试。
William Safran, “Diasporas in Modern Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return”, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies 1.1 (1991): 67–83. ↩
For later diasporic artists, this loss also signifies the loss of subjectivity loss aggravated by the era, and their traditional attribution has become an eternally unsettled issue. Kan Xuan (b.1972, Xuancheng) seemed to foresee the coming dramatic changes in living situation at the turn of the century. In her work KanXuan Ai! (1999), she runs and shouts her name while traversing the passage of Beijing’s largest subway interchange station. This symbolic action not only foreshadowed her later career but also became a collective portrayal of diasporic artists calling out to themselves. After receiving the fellowship from Rijksakademie van Beeldende Kunsten (Amsterdam) in 2002, Kan Xuan began to shuttle between Beijing and Amsterdam. Her creative themes were also influenced by these life trajectories: from the early intake of Western ideologies (A Happy Girl, 2002) to later reflections on East-West differences and the wealth gap brought about by globalisation (Island, 2006–2009), to later explorations of Chineseness (Millet Mounds, 2012), all of which subtly reveal the process of a creative subject digesting and absorbing foreign cultures and ultimately choosing to return to their historical roots. This aligns with the characteristics of “diaspora” proposed by William Safran: from initial geographical mobility to longing for one’s homeland, and finally, due to the difficulty to fully integrate into the host country, forming an even stronger identification with their place of origin1.
Contemporary to Kan Xuan but living as a second-generation immigrant on the West Coast of the United States, Patty Chang (b.1972, San Francisco) has had a more prolonged and embodied experience and reflection on her identity as an Asian female artist. Her early video work, Fountain (1999), vividly presents the relationship between self and others. In the work, she sips the water off a mirror’s surface, symbolising a subject drinking from its reflection (the other) to make itself whole. Unlike first-generation immigrants, second-generation immigrant artists work almost entirely with full awareness of their identity as the other. Sometimes, this consciousness of considering one’s “there-being” (Dasein) as “other-being” can lead to self-empowerment, helping artists use their otherness as a point of resistance. In Shangri-La (2015), Chang travels to Zhongdian, a rural town near Tibet (which claims to be the prototype of Shangri-La from the novel Lost Horizon), using fictional narratives and realistic photography to document stereotyped works completed with local people. The crude treatment of local culture and identity imagination in this way precisely depicts the mask imposed on her as a Chinese female, responding to the particularity of concrete other.
Yao Qingmei (b.1982, Wenzhou), who emigrated to France after completing her master’s degree, is also skilled in such identity strategies. In her work Dance! Dance! Bruce Ling! (2013), she wears Bruce Lee’s classic yellow tracksuit with black stripes, wielding a sickle and hammer in front of a rough and sketchy bamboo scenery backdrop, accompanied by her fighting sounds and a pianist playing the Fury of the Dragon theme tune. The performance video documents her collage interpretation of these Chinese symbols, ending with her exhaustion and collapse. The excess and disintegration of symbols linger in the video frame along with her vocal echoes. If the aforementioned two works are still based on the identity of the other in the West, then Sanzu Ding and its Motif: Hypotheses on the Origin and Evolution of the ‘Hammer-Sickle’ Symbol (2013–present) is a serious fabrication by Yao Qingmei as the other of her native land. In this long-term “research project”, “Professor Yao” she played investigates the “sickle and hammer” motif found on an unearthed artefact, thoroughly objectifying symbols from her native ideological environment and turning the exploration of motif history into an attempt to alienate her own history.
William Safran, “Diasporas in Modern Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return”, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies 1.1 (1991): 67–83. ↩
异地是故乡
Now-Here
离散研究的兴起与其说是为了应对这一群体引发的文化课题,不如说是为了回应这个时代普遍蔓延的无家可归感。汉娜・阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)曾把人造卫星的发射视为 “在重要性上无可比拟的事件”,因为它让人意识到逃离地球家园是可能的 1。而如卡斯滕・哈里斯(Karsten Harries)所说,天文学和一般科学的进步使地球变得越来越不像家,事实上,自哥白尼之后,人类就已经流离失所了 2。
因此,对于现生活于纽约与伦敦的 刘昕(b.1991, 新疆)而言,朝向外太空的探索反而成为一种对 “家” 的测量。在 M + 委约创作的《地表之下别无他物》(2021)中,通过再现废旧卫星发出的电波讯号与气象图像,追踪其运动轨迹,刘昕将那些被遗忘的外太空人造物重新带回人们的视野。这些曾经承载着自由之梦的卫星就像是宇宙航行学的象征物 —— 最初把我们留在家中,现在却被我们遗弃家外 —— 这何尝不也是部分离散群体的处境?艺术家因一种后人类中心主义的视角与它们产生共情,同时也借以抒怀自身对离散境遇的感触。就像《白石》(2021)中,她将火箭的残骸亲密称呼为 “她”,这个在火箭升空时落下的碎片正如同艺术家在另一个项目中送至外太空的智齿(《Living/Distance 脱离》,2019–2020),它们都是从一个身体中陨落的部分,如不刻意持存便会被轻易忘却。
“非人类” 同样也引发工作生活于纽约的 曹舒怡(b.1990,广州)的共情。艺术家曾坦言,生态艺术是她作为华人女性移民在美国身份政治语境中确立自身位置的方法。从多物种民族志的框架出发,她得以通过去殖民主义与华语语系的视角,反思以欧美话语为中心的生态女性主义。这一代的女性移民艺术家大多受益于女性主义对 “他者” 概念的介入。当西蒙娜・德・波伏瓦(Simone de Beauvoir)指出 “女人是他者,男人是本质存在” 时,女性与少数群体、动物、自然的结盟也就成了《第二性》的伏笔。通过分析主权群体的话语建构,他者便有可能解离现行权力结构中的不平等,或者至少获得思辨与行动的方向。转念一想,跨物种亲缘性或许是他者性的一种赠予。女性、华人、移民、艺术家,正是这些身份的叠加触发曹舒怡将生物与地质的嬗变置于行星时空观中,如影像《史前史及其后》(2023)通过元素 “磷” 揭示自然的再生与轮回;不仅如此,这也让个体更敏感于自身他者身份的流转,如同艺术家所说,海外经历使其作品在国内展览语境中被看作是 “西方式的”,离散境遇让她只能从一种他者转换为另一种他者,创作者的故乡成了无法确认的他处。
但 “离散” 的古希腊语(διασπορά)词根拒绝这样失落的意义,因其本身还包含着 “播种” 的词义。后者指明了离散艺术家的另一种精神归宿,那就是在地方性知识之中工作与生活。这是近年迁徙至天空岛(Isle of Skye)上的沈莘(b.1990,四川)所践行的信念与方法。在她的经历中,离散揭示了一种个体能够触及的更深层联系。她的影像《天雨粟 #1,我们在这个语言中相遇》(2023)由一次看牙经历引发。在牙齿被金属物敲击了三个小时之久后,沈莘突然想象牙齿与海洋的关联,而后她查明科学家确实相信,人类的牙齿在四亿年前就是鱼鳞。在此,跨越人类文明时间的骨骼记忆以具身性的形式被唤醒。演化生物学的尺度与思辨实在论所说的 “前先祖性”,瞬间悬置了现有身份与历史的实在性,促使沈莘转向当时当地的真实。正如同她学习藏语与阿拉伯文重新确认自我的历史,将曾经驻留过的双子城指认为原住民 Dakhóta Oyáte 的土地 Miní Sóta Makhóčhe,沈莘的在地性实践呈现了离散的另一面故事。正如 “离家” 也可被理解为修行意义上的 “出家”,无家可归或许也可能指向值得被期待的旅途。(翻译:赵文睿)
The rise of diaspora studies is not so much about addressing the cultural issues raised by these groups as it is about responding to the widespread sense of homelessness in our era. Hannah Arendt once described the launch of artificial satellites as an event that is “second in importance to no other” because it made people realise that escaping Earth as a home was possible1. As Karsten Harries noted, the progress in astronomy and science has made the Earth increasingly less homelike; indeed, humans have been displaced since Copernicus2.
Thus, for Xin Liu (b. 1991, Xinjiang), who currently works and lives in New York and London, exploring outer space has become a way to measure “home”. In her work The Earth Is an Image (2021), commissioned by M+, she recreates the radio signals and climate images sent by obsolete satellites. She traces their movements and brings those forgotten artefacts of outer space back to people’s vision. These satellites, which once carried dreams of freedom, are like symbols of Astronautics—they initially left us at home, but now we’ve abandoned them outside of it. This, too, reflects the situation of some diaspora groups. The artist empathises with these satellites from a post-humanist perspective and expresses her feelings about the diasporic condition. In White Stone (2021), she intimately refers to the debris of a rocket as “her”. This fragment, which fell when the missile was launched, is like the wisdom tooth she sent into outer space in another project (Living/Distance, 2019–2020). These fallen body parts would be quickly forgotten if not intentionally preserved.
The “non-human” subjects similarly evoke empathy in New York-based artist Shuyi Cao (b.1990, Guangzhou). She has stated that ecological art is a way, as a Chinese female immigrant, to establish her position within the context of identity politics in the United States. From the framework of multispecies ethnography, she reflects on ecofeminism centred on Western discourses through the lens of de-colonialism and Sinophone perspectives. This generation of female immigrant artists largely benefits from feminism’s engagement with the concept of “Otherness”. When Simone de Beauvoir pointed out that “she is the Other (elle est l’Autre), he is the essential being,” the alliance between women, minorities, animals, and nature became subtexts of The Second Sex. By analysing the discourse constructed by sovereign groups, the Other can potentially dismantle the inequalities in existing power structures or at least gain direction for speculation and action. On further thought, multi-species kinship might be a gift of otherness. As a woman, a Chinese, an immigrant, and an artist, Cao Shuyi’s overlapping identities prompt her to place the transformations of biology and geology within a planetary time scale. In her video work Begin with the End of What Comes Before (2023), she uses the element phosphorus to reveal the regeneration and reincarnation of nature. Moreover, this also makes her more sensitive to the shifts in her own identity as an Other. As the artist herself said, her overseas experiences cause her work to be perceived as “Western” in domestic exhibition contexts. Her diasporic condition makes her only transit from one form of Otherness to another, with her homeland becoming an uncertain “elsewhere”.
However, the etymology of diaspora (διασπορά) refuses such a forlorn meaning, as it also contains the connotation of “to scatter, to sow.” The latter points to another spiritual home for diasporic artists: to work and live within the knowledge of the locality. This is the belief and method practised by Shen Xin (b.1990, Sichuan), who recently migrated to the Isle of Skye. In her experience, diaspora reveals a more profound connection that an individual can reach. Her video Grounds of Coherence #1, but this is the language we met in (2023), was inspired by a dental experience. After her tooth was struck by a metal object for three hours, Shen Xin suddenly imagined a connection between teeth and the ocean, later discovering that scientists indeed believe human teeth were fish scales 400 million years ago. Here, the skeletal memory of pre-human civilisation is awakened in an embodied form. The scale of evolutionary biology and the “ancestrality” (l'ancestralité) described by speculative realism momentarily suspend the reality of current identity and history, prompting Shen Xin to turn towards the reality of the Now and Here. Just as she reaffirms her personal history by learning Tibetan and Arabic and identifies the Twin Cities, where she once resided, as the land of the aborigine Dakhóta Oyáte, Miní Sóta Makhóčhe, Shen Xin’s practice of locality presents another side of the diaspora story. Just as “leaving home” can also be understood in a spiritual sense as “renunciation” (Pabbajjā, which means “to go forth”), to be homeless might also point to a journey worth anticipating. (Translated by Zhao Wenrui)
陈嘉莹,哲学博士,现为上海交通大学人文学院博士后研究员、独立策展人与写作者。毕业于华东师范大学外国哲学系,聚焦身体、新唯物论与性别形上学的前沿研究。她近来转向受女性主义与后殖民理论启发的离散美学,也关注艺术理论的在地化实践。与此同时,她将艺术视为颠覆现有可感分治与可知框架的具体手段。她曾供职于没顶公司并担任 Longlati 经纬艺术中心的艺术总监,亦曾为多家艺术媒体撰稿。2019 年,她以展览 “AI:爱与人工智能” 获得第三届 Hyundai Blue Prize 创新未来奖。
陈嘉莹学士毕业于中国美术学院美术学专业,后在英国兰卡斯特大学获硕士学位。其文章收录于《网络化的力量》、《普遍手册》以及由 Springer 出版的《Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence》等。她曾参与编写《1998 年后的上海当代艺术文献研究计划》。近期策划的项目包括:“张移北:请脱钢盔”,Longlati 经纬艺术中心(2024);“威廉・萨斯纳尔:沥青之下”,Longlati 经纬艺术中心(2023);由瑞士文化基金会支持的 “百花齐放读书会:半路遇见”,多地多空间(2022–2023);“生物 / 媒介:缠绕的读书会”,新时线媒体艺术中心(CAC),上海;USB 多端口链接展,上海多空间(2021);“AI:爱与人工智能”,北京现代汽车文化中心(2020);哥白尼,E.M.Bannister 画廊,美国普罗维登斯(2019)等。
Jenny Jiaying Chen is currently a postdoctoral researcher at the School of Humanities, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, independent curator, and writer. She obtained her PhD from the Department of Western Philosophy at East China Normal University, focusing on the frontier research of the body, new materialism and the metaphysics of sex. She has recently turned to diaspora aesthetics inspired by feminist and postcolonial theories and is also concerned with the localization practice of art theory. At the same time, she sees art as a concrete means of subverting the existing partition of the sensible and frames of intelligibility. She has previously worked at MadeIn Company and as the Art Director of Longlati Foundation. She has contributed to many art media and won the “Hyundai Blue Prize 2019.”
She holds a BA from the China Academy of Art and received her MA from Lancaster University (UK). Her article was included in Forces of Reticulation and Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence, published by Springer, among others. She also participated in the compilation of the Shanghai Contemporary Art Archival Project 1998–2010. Recent Projects include: “Zhang Yibei: Please No Helmet”, Longlati Foundation (2024); “Wilhelm Sasnal: Under the Asphalt”, Longlati Foundation (2023); “Let 100 Reading Groups Bloom: Meeting Others Halfway”, supported by Pro Helvetia Shanghai, Swiss Arts Council (2022–2023); “Bio/Media: Entangled Reading Group”, Chronus Art Center (CAC), Shanghai; “USB Multi-Port connect Exhibition”, multiple art spaces in Shanghai (2021); “AI: Love and Artificial Intelligence”, Hyundai Motorstudio, Beijing (2020); “Copernicus”, E.M.Bannister Gallery of Rhode Island College, Providence (2019).