既然此文以生活和工作于海外的华裔女艺术家为谈论的内容,那么必然无法避免对美国艺术界身份政治大环境的一个简要梳理。作为非白人的少数族裔基本无法在一个绝对抽象的身份中进行创作或是被理解。尽管本文有提及生活在欧洲的艺术家,但笔者对欧洲的环境并没有深入的了解,所以本文以美国为代表的身份政治文化环境为出发点。美国主流艺术体系对少数族裔、弱势群体艺术家的关注总是和身份政治、意识形态和经济市场脱不开干系:冷战结束后的东欧热,已经翻篇成为往事的中国当代艺术热,和正在如火如荼进行着的黑人艺术热…… 而二战后兴起的、代表美国白人现代艺术最高成就的抽象表现主义,曾冠冕堂皇地以普世自居,看似和种族身份、意识形态、政治运动没有任何瓜葛,也其实曾是美国参与冷战的工具,而背后的推手正是有着绝对文化权力的纽约现代艺术博物馆(MoMA)和其由财团精英组成的董事会成员们 1。

过去几年由于 “黑命攸关”(Black Lives Matter)运动的推进,黑人艺术家受到近乎可以被形容为狂热的追捧。各大美术馆纷纷开始重审馆内偏颇的收藏体系,大力推崇收藏黑人艺术家的作品,画廊开始趋之若鹜地代理黑人艺术家,作品市场价格飙升,即使是本来对美国黑人社会政治运动、黑人艺术史和殖民史一无所知(或者有意规避)的藏家富太太们,也开始高价收入黑人艺术家的作品并常常与黑人艺术家结伴出入各种艺术派对,不然自己显得不入流、不时髦,甚至是错过了投资的好机会。而去年威尼斯双年展美国馆由正当红的美国黑人艺术家西蒙妮・利(Simone Leigh)坐镇也更是完美反映了这来自各方面的 “宠幸”,或许 “黑命攸关” 真的取得了阶段性的胜利。

Footnotes

  1. Eva Cockcroft, “Abstract Expressionism, Weapon Of The Cold War”, Artforum, summer, 1974. https://www.artforum.com/print/197406/abstract-expressionism-weapon-of-the-cold-war-38017 ↩

As this article focuses on Chinese female artists who live and work overseas, I want to begin with a brief overview of the identity politics in the American art world. It is almost impossible for non-white minority artists’ practice to be comprehended devoid of that context. This article also mentions artists based in Europe, but my overall understanding of the European art scene is limited, so the focal point here is the identity politics and cultural environment in the United States. In the American art world, identity politics, ideology, and market dynamics play a crucial role in shaping the perception and reception of the so-called minority and marginalized artists. It is evident in historical instances such as the post-Cold War fascination with Eastern European art, the now bygone passion for contemporary Chinese art, and the current flourishing Black art scene. Abstract Expressionism, which emerged in the post-World War II era and is often regarded as the epitome of white modern American art, initially presented itself as universal and seemingly detached from racial identity, ideology, or political movements. However, Abstract Expressionism was also a tool the United States employed during the Cold War era, promoted by the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York, a cultural powerhouse whose board of trustees consisted of affluent elites1.

Propelled by the “Black Lives Matter” movement in recent years, Black artists have garnered fervent attention and acclaim. Art museums, spurred by a newfound commitment, have earnestly reexamined their biased collection practice and enthusiastically embraced works by Black artists. Galleries have actively sought out Black artists, leading to a notable surge in the market prices of their works. Even collectors who were previously ignorant of (or intentionally avoided) issues related to African American political and social movements, Black art history, and colonial history, are now paying substantial sums for works by Black artists, reluctant to miss out on lucrative investment opportunities. They are often spotted at art parties alongside Black artists, striving to project an image of sophistication and trendiness. The selection of Simone Leigh to represent the U.S. Pavilion at last year’s Venice Biennale further exemplifies art world’s fervor for Black artists. Perhaps “Black Lives Matter” has indeed achieved a significant milestone.

Footnotes

  1. Eva Cockcroft, “Abstract Expressionism, Weapon Of The Cold War", Artforum, summer, 1974. https://www.artforum.com/print/197406/abstract-expressionism-weapon-of-the-cold-war-38017 ↩

尽管中国当代艺术随着市场的升温和资本的介入有过一段时间的热度,但它始终被视作是与美国本土语境无法直接有效融合的 “外乡之物”,虽然与美国局势和政治社会历史有一定的交集,但这种来自西方知识分子自居高位,对中国文化和艺术的投射和想象在不断变化的时代情绪中被慢慢淡忘,甚者开始保持距离。一方面,中国当代艺术的热潮并没有对离散华裔(Chinese Diaspora)艺术家有过多少正面的影响,华裔艺术家的实践长期以来都是在一种孤立的状态下进行,这与亚裔主体和精英阶层不温不火,甚至多有保守的政治立场密切相关;另一方面,和黑人群体 “抱团取暖” 的状态不同,亚裔内部有着更为复杂的地区历史和政治张力,以及文化上与故土保持的牵连和对自身民族国家身份的患得患失,都让一种集体的亚裔面貌很难出现。而亚裔女性(包括跨性别女艺术家)以及非二元性别艺术家 1,尤其是华裔,在西方海外主流艺术体系中基本还是处于隐形的状态,即便偶尔零星地以展览面貌发声,其声音也是非常微弱的。美术馆大机构级别的个展几乎是闻所未闻,华裔艺术家的机构收藏也并不成体系,即便是小型非收藏基金会和展览空间也极少有给予个人光环的个展。尽管华裔还是处于游走在边缘的状态,也无法与迅速扩大影响力的黑人艺术圈相比,她 / 他们始终没有选择用具有景观色彩的、抗议式的直白表达方式,这也成为了她 / 他们实践具有独立性且作品拥有真正独特见解的原因之一。这种具有更多知性思考、诗性和隐喻的娓娓道来在当下日趋短、平、快的艺术消费体系中的确不能快速讨好。

这种在中间漂移的状态,在黑白二元周旋的处境是离散人群所可以共情的。在瑞典斯德哥尔摩出身长大的广东裔艺术家林立施自 2021 年在斯德哥尔摩邦尼尔艺术馆(Bonniers Konsthall)举办个展以来,开始在国际上得到不少关注。林的家庭是一个典型的华人移民家庭,甚至可以说是有点刻板印象般的精准。她是第二代移民,而最初搬往瑞典的奶奶以开中国餐馆为生,并在家庭生意发家后传给林的父母继续经营。林的创作多以自己在中国餐馆长大的个人经历为出发点,将在欧洲还常常被称为 “东方主义” 的符号结合 3D 扫描、3D 打印、VR 等新媒体技术等来讲述她自己和家庭的移民故事。比如出现在多媒体系列作品《母语》(2017~2019)中的影像,是她用当时还并不成熟的 3D 扫描技术记录下的中国餐馆的内部结构、装修装饰,希望可以用此来保存自己对餐馆的记忆。可惜输出的文件像素粗劣,图像模糊变形,显然成不了对中国餐馆精准的记忆。但在林看来,这如废墟般的意象却正恰到好处地将这些中国餐馆变成了一种如幽灵般的存在,或者说是德里达所谓的 “存活状态”(survivance),它既不是死亡也不是生存那么简单直白,而是一种无法在将生与死对立起来的基础上去理解的东西 2。这种暧昧的状态恰如其分地对映了她自身离散经历无法直观了解本源文化,它既没有死去,也不是鲜活的,而是在输入输出中被不断地重新解构和定义,它是不完美的,若即若离的,但却让林有了对自身身份多重想象的可能性。

对于多重身份的想象以另一种独特的方式在 程心怡 的绘画中温婉有趣地呈现出来。程描绘的对象多以男性人物为主,偶尔有动物出现,但都是她日常生活之周遭所遇。她刻画的男性角色充满了私密和情愫,以一种特有的女性观看和凝视表现出来。而她也毫不掩饰自己心中的爱意,那种暧昧的欲望从不直白但却浸沁在色彩、构图和笔触之间。程的绘画并未刻意,但却挑战了男性对女性身体的凝视传统,在身份转换之间形成一种不同的权力商榷。

Footnotes

  1. 本文的框架虽然是以女性艺术家身份为出发点,但文中提及的一些艺术家并不单一地以女性或男性身份自识(gender non-binary),比如艺术家沈莘,由此特别指出。另外,虽未在本文提及,还有艺术家是跨性别(transgender)的女性艺术家,其对自身性别的认同与其出生时指定性别不相同。 ↩

  2. Jacques Derrida, The Beast and the Sovereign, Volume II, ed. Michel Lisse, Marie-Louise Mallet, and Ginette Michaud, trans. Geoffrey Bennington (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011), 130 ↩

Contemporary Chinese art enjoyed a stint as the darling of the art world, driven by market forces and capital. But it has always been seen as an "alien" that cannot be effectively integrated into the local American context. Despite its relevance to American society and its political and social history, the enthusiasm for contemporary Chinese art among self-important Western intellectuals has waned over the changing zeitgeist, with a noticeable distancing from it. The enthusiasm for contemporary Chinese art had little positive impact on diasporic Chinese artists. They have long practiced art in isolation, primarily due to the reticence within the Asian community and elite circles, where many hold conservative political stances. Moreover, unlike the widespread solidarity in the Black community, Asian communities have been grappling with complex regional histories and political tensions. Achieving a unified Asian front proves challenging, given the cultural ties each group maintains with their homelands and their ambivalence toward national identity. Asian women (including transwomen artists) and non-binary artists 1, especially those of Chinese descent, remain largely invisible within the mainstream Western art system. Their voices, faint at best, sporadically emerge in group shows. Major museums, and even smaller non-collecting foundations and spaces, have hosted very few solo exhibitions devoted to Chinese diasporic artists. Institutional collections of their works remain unmethodical. While still on the fringes and unable to rival the rapidly expanding influence of Black art, Chinese diasporic artists have consistently opted for less spectacular, overt, or antagonistic expressions. This deliberate choice is a key factor in maintaining their practice's independence and genuinely unique perspectives. The nuanced narratives in their works, along with intellectually charged reflection, poeticism, and metaphor, tend not to be favored in the ever more fast-paced and superficial landscape of art consumption.

This state of drifting in between black-and-white dualism characterizes the Chinese diasporic community. Born and raised in Stockholm, Swedish Cantones artist Lap-See Lam has gained significant international attention since her solo exhibition at Bonniers Konsthall in Stockholm in 2021. She is a second-generation immigrant and grew up in a typical, even stereotypical Chinese immigrant family. Her grandmother initially came to Sweden and made a living by opening a Chinese restaurant—a successful family business that her parents continued to run. Lam’s creative work often draws from her personal experiences coming to age in a Chinese restaurant in Sweden as a starting point to narrate her and her family’s immigration story. She skillfully combines symbols commonly associated with “Orientalism” in European discourses with new media technologies, such as 3D scanning and printing, and VR. For example, the images in the multimedia series Mother’s Tongue (2017–2019) were captured using 3D scanning technology. By recording the interior structure and decoration of the Chinese restaurant, Lam hoped to preserve her memories of the restaurant. Unfortunately, the technology was still at an early developmental stage and therefore the output files had poor resolution, resulting in blurry and distorted images that failed to reenact the precise memory of the Chinese restaurant. However, Lam found unexpected aesthetics in the ruin-like imagery, which perfectly rendered the restaurant as a kind of ghostly presence, akin to what Derrida termed “survivance” 2. This state, neither death nor life, exists beyond binary understanding. Mirrorring her own diasporic experience of being unable to firmly grasp her origin, such ambiguity neither belongs to the realm of the dead nor the living but is in a perpetual state of deconstruction and redefinition through the processes of input and output; imperfect and elusive, it enables Lam to envision various possibilities of her own identity.

Xinyi Cheng’s paintings take on a uniquely gentle and intriguing expression to imagine multiple identities. Her subjects, predominantly male characters and occasionally animals, are all drawn from her daily encounters. She portrays her male figures through a distinctive female gaze, infusing the image with intimacy and desire. Cheng does not shy away from expressing her own affection. Though never overt, it permeates the image through the interplay of color, composition, and brushworks. Her paintings are not deliberate provocations, yet they challenge the tradition of the female body being the subject of the male gaze, shaping a negotiation of powers through the shift of identities.

Footnotes

  1. While this article is centered on the identity of female artists, it is important to note that some of the artists mentioned here do not exclusively identify as either female or male, like Shen Xin. Additionally, although not discussed in this article, some artists are transwomen, whose gender identity differs from the sex assigned to them at birth. ↩

  2. Jacques Derrida, The Beast and the Sovereign, Volume II, ed. Michel Lisse, Marie-Louise Mallet, and Ginette Michaud, trans. Geoffrey Bennington (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011), 130 ↩

随着 “#Metoo” 运动近年来在西方的不断深入,艺术界也在各种以身份政治为背景的洪流中重新刮起女性主义艺术的风潮。而欧美文化界似乎也更迫切地意识到了以精英阶层白人女性视角和历史经验为绝大部分女性主义理论和美术史基础的局限和片面性,从而开始寻求所谓非主流身份学者和创作者所能带来的更广阔的知识和经验,以此来扩大女性主义的定义、范围和受众。在亚裔学者和创作者中,郑明河的创作被广泛引用,作为美籍越南裔,郑明河有着学者、教授、影像工作者、多媒体艺术家、作家、作曲家等等极其多样的文化身份,尽管她并不自我标榜为女性主义的学者,但她长期专注于个人经验和社会集体意识的历史矛盾、后殖民注视和遗留暴力、多重性和多样性解读等等的议题,其中不仅暴露出主流女性主义论述的缺陷,更是为进行得如火如荼的多元交织性讨论(intersectionality)提供了一个独特的切入点 1。

郑明河所代表的女性视角和经验显然不是宣言式的、二元对立式的,其所提出的众多观看和理解世界的方式本身期许以一种自然的过程慢慢瓦解男性历史观和社会结构,这也与之前提到的亚裔女性艺术家的创作状态相呼应。前些年旅居欧洲、目前常驻纽约的四川籍艺术家沈莘近年来的创作常常探索新的表现的政治和表现的美学,以及表现的背叛和不可靠,简单地来说,即如何表现?其作品反复讨论的议题包括语言、可传播性和可翻译性、对鬼魅和精神、精灵的想象和造像等等,在一种自我身份认知和历史叙述中抽丝剥茧出不断焦灼反复的故事性和真实性。沈的视野开阔,对历史有着浓厚的兴趣,其作品也越发有兴致在其本源文化之外的跨国和跨地域研究。沈莘从来不简单粗暴地拿东西方做对比,比如其所生活和工作的欧美语境,而是在多重边界中寻求被主流文化忽略的潜能。我想正如当年郑明河记录塞纳加尔 —— 一个对她来说陌生的、不曾有亲身经历的当地文化和日常时做的深入考量,沈也在实践中不断测试自身作为艺术家的观看和介入方式。沈近年来两部重要作品《ས་གཞི་སྔོན་པོ་འགྱུར།(大地转绿)》(2022)和《盐湖(新身体)》都可体现这些创作方向。

《ས་གཞི་སྔོན་པོ་འགྱུར།(大地转绿)》是沈莘于 2022 年被纽约瑞士学院(Swiss Institute)委任创作的影像和声音装置作品。通过使用剧场舞台灯光来虚拟出一年四季中一天光阴的变化,而声音中的对话则用英文和藏文记录了艺术家和其藏文老师之间的对话,内容为在其学习藏文的过程中如何来描述光和颜色。投影悬挂在展厅中间的屏幕的两侧,唯美的错综光影没有任何的具体形象,仿若抽象绘画一般,却在文字的氤氲中让人浮想联翩。在《盐湖(新身体)》中,沈虚构了一个在碘回收工厂车间中,两个女工和两个以摄像镜头视角表现,但从未出现在画面中的员工角色之间,用韩语、日语和俄语对话的场景。对话的内容涉及生态、科技、经济和个人记忆,通过开采和回收碘之过程的象征意义,比如萃取、同化和与其他元素的互相作用,来探讨韩国移民在俄罗斯和日本复杂的历史经历。由于民族身份认同、迫害和被迫迁徙,她们的集体意识和身份始终时处于无国家的状态。尽管一直以来都参与当地社会生产,但却无法发声或获得可视性,她们的存在永远都是在与它处的关系中,通过语言、家庭,情感和土地等的纠葛勾画出来的负型。

Footnotes

  1. 多元交织性讨论关注传统社会结构和系统中,身份、种族、性别处于边缘或弱势社群所能连接和共享的受压迫经验,一次来探索共情的可能性。在众多理论和实践中,黑人社群和 LGBTQ 社群的历史经验在多年的努力下,有着更多的基础和影响力,很多研究此论述的亚裔女性艺术家和学者都会关注并深入理解此些社群,比如郑明河早年间在塞纳加尔进行的创作、调研和写作。但反过来关注并试图了解研究亚裔女性艺术家经验,并与之建立多元交织性关联,提出创新切建树的新观点却非常少见。求其缘由,还需另一篇文章来分析。 ↩

With the prevalence of the “#MeToo” movement in recent years in the West, the art world has witnessed a resurgence of feminist art within the currents of identity politics. Cultural circles in Europe and America have become increasingly aware of the limitations and partiality inherent in feminist theories and art histories based predominantly on white elite women’s perspectives and historical experiences. Consequently, there is a growing quest for knowledge and experiences brought forth by the so-called non-mainstream scholars and practitioners to broaden the definition, scope, and audience of feminism. Among Asian scholars and artists, the work of Trinh T. Minh-ha stands out and is widely celebrated. A Vietnamese-American, Trinh embodies a diverse range of cultural identities, including scholar, professor, filmmaker, multimedia artist, writer, and composer. While she does not explicitly identify as a feminist scholar, Trinh has long focused on issues such as the historical tension between individual experience and social collective consciousness, the postcolonial gaze and enduring violence, and interpretations of multiplicity and diversity. Her works not only expose the shortcomings of mainstream feminist discourse but also provide a unique entry point for the ongoing heated discussions on intersectionality 1.

Trinh’s representation of the female perspective and experience is not declarative or polarized. The myriad ways of viewing and understanding the world that she proposes anticipate an organic and gradual erosion of male-centric historical perspectives and social structures. The approach resonates with other Asian female artists. Shen Xin, a native of Sichuan who lived in Europe, is currently based in New York. They have recently grappled with the question of how to represent, exploring new politics and aesthetics of representation, as well as the betrayals and unreliability in the act of representation. The recurring themes in their works include language, communicability and translatability, and imagination and portrayal of ghosts, spirits, and elves. By delving into self-identity and historical narratives, she extracts poignant and complex narratives that osciliate between stories and truths. With a broad perspective and a strong interest in history, Shen’s works increasingly expand to transnational and cross-regional contexts beyond their own cultural background. Rather than crudely contrasting Eastern culture with the Euro-American context in which they lives and works, Shen seeks the potential overlooked by mainstream culture, testing multiple boundaries. Much like Trinh, who once documented Senegal, a culture and everyday extremely alien to her, Shen continuously experiments with their ways of seeing and intervening as an artist. Two major recent works, The Earth Turned Green (2022) and Brine Lake (A New Body) (2020), both reflect their creative trajectory and priorities.

The Earth Turned Green is an audio-visual installation commissioned by the Swiss Institute in New York in 2022. Shen uses theatrical stage lighting to simulate the changing light throughout the day over the four seasons. The sound accompaniment comprises recorded conversations in English and Tibetan between her and her Tibetan language teacher, centered around discussions on describing light and color in Tibetan. The projections are positioned on both sides of the screen at the center of the exhibition space. The images, appearing like abstract paintings, do not represent specific entities, , but evoke a myriad of imaginations through the immersion of words. In Brine Lake (A New Body), Shen constructs a scene set in an iodine recovery factory, featuring two female workers and two invisible characters represented by the perspectives of camera lenses. Their dialogue unfolds in Korean, Japanese, and Russian, covering topics related to ecology, technology, economy, and personal memory. The processes of extracting and recovering iodine, encompassing extraction, assimilation, and interaction with other elements, serve as metaphors to explore the intricate historical experiences of Korean immigrants in Russia and Japan. Due to issues of national identity, persecution, and forced migration, their collective consciousness and identity remain perpetually statelessness. Despite their ongoing participation in local production, they struggle to attain visibility or have their voices heard. Their existence is only defined by the elsewhere, a negative image delineated through conflicts of language, family, emotions, and land.

Footnotes

  1. Intersectionality is concerned with understanding the shared oppressed experiences among marginalized or vulnerable communities in traditional societal structures and systems, in terms of identity, race, and gender. This approach aims to explore the possibility of empathy. Among the various theories and practices, the historical experiences of the Black community and the LGBTQ community have, over the years, laid a more substantial foundation and had more influence. Many Asian female artists and scholars engaging with this analytic framework often pay attention to and attempt to understand these communities, such as Trinh T. Minh-ha’s early work in Senegal. However, there is a scarcity of efforts to delve into the experiences of Asian female artists, establish intersectional connections, and propose innovative viewpoints. The reasons behind this gap would require another article to analyze thoroughly. ↩

最后想要提到的是,华裔女艺术家曾经较少涉猎的科技、技术和艺术跨界创作的领域也在出现有意思和有深度的实践。在男权的社会结构下,女性的视角和认知方式于一直以来都被视作是片面、私密、不周全和不普世客观的,而科学和科技则是被认作为几乎唯一不受主观情感影响的绝对客观存在。这种科学观正在科学界和哲学界自身的发展和社会运动作为下被瓦解,而女性艺术家的经验则为其提供了更有建树的切入点。转辗于伦敦和纽约两地的 刘昕 长期关注卫星、火箭的技术发展和对外太空的想象,并通过个人私密化地介入,来探索身体和宇宙的关系,以及在外太空技术发展过程中所嵌入的国家竞争和意识形态。

生活工作于纽约的 苗颖 算是游走于网络的前辈人物,她执着于挖掘和呈现网络中,尤其是中国互联网文化中出现的荒谬日常和文化错位,以及电脑技术和资本对全球的影响。从 2019 年开始,苗投入到人工智能的研究中,她的一系列新作品有关机器学习软件的开发和人工智能绘画。同在纽约的 曹舒怡 以雕塑和装置创作为主,结合精致的手工艺和电脑数码输出的制品来探索科学、生物、技术文化、神秘学和宇宙学之间的多重交集,并将酷儿理论带入实践中。刘娃近来的作品也关注科技和环境之间的辩证关系,尤其是军事技术、改造自然和解决气候危机之间的历史矛盾。她的很多影像作品由作为音乐家的丈夫鲍杨作乐配曲。跨界电影和艺术的王裕言在去年柏林双年展上的作品让人眼前一亮,常驻巴黎的她曾在国际各大电影节上崭露头角并多次获得奖项,她的电影短片常常以网络视频、电影片段等为素材进行回收和重新剪辑,创作出新的叙事,以近乎荒诞和诡异的方式批判资本主义大环境下由 “注意力经济”(attention economy)所催生的图像生产和消费。

文章的篇幅有限,除了不能作深入的讨论外,肯定也漏去了许多正积极创作和思考的艺术家们,我想女性作为一种身份,既可以是优势和机会,也不免成为桎梏,因此我们最终还需回到艺术家个人的主体性上来理解和阐释她们的创作实践。另一方面,更重要的是,年轻一代的艺术家们已开始对自身性别和性别二元论发出深刻的反思,她们对自身性别的认识也往往是多重性的,我们也不再能简单地将这些视角划分到男或女的传统框架中去。这种持续对多元性、多重性的思考和讨论必将是未来艺术、哲学和科技发展的重要基础。(翻译:赵文睿)

Chinese diasporic female artists, once less engaged in interdisciplinary art practices involving technology and engineering, are now producing intriguing and profound works in these realms. Under the patriarchal societal structure, female perspectives and modes of knowing have long been considered private, incomplete, and lacking in universal objectivity. Science and technology have been upheld as probably the only domains unaffected by subjective emotions and absolute objective existence. Nevertheless, this view on science is gradually being dismantled within the scientific and philosophical communities, fueled by developments within the fields and social movements. The experiences of female artists also contribute to this constructive shift in perspective. Xin Liu, who divides her time between London and New York, has been exploring the technological advancements in satellites and rockets, as well as the imaginations of outer space. Via a personal and intimate approach, she investigates the relationship between the human body and the cosmos, and the competition and ideologies underpinning the development of outer space technology.

Miao Ying, based in New York, is a veteran in addressing the Internet as a phenomenon. She is dedicated to uncovering and presenting the absurdities and cultural dislocation within online spaces, particularly in Chinese internet culture. Her focus extends to the impact of computer technology and capital on a global scale. Since 2019, Miao has ventured into the realm of artificial intelligence. She has produced a series of new works related to the development of machine learning software and AI-generated art. Shuyi Cao, also based in New York, primarily works with sculpture and installation. Her practice spans the intersections of science, biology, technological culture, mysticism, and cosmology, by combining meticulous craftsmanship with digital outputs. She also incorporates queer theory into her practice. Liu Wa’s recent works also scrutinize the dialectical relationship between technology and the environment, particularly the historical dilemmas between military technology, environmental alteration, and the solutions to the climate crisis. Many of her visual works are accompanied by music composed by her husband, the musician Bao Yang. Wang Yuyan, a boundary-pushing figure at the intersection of film and art, garnered attention with her work at the Berlin Biennale last year. Based in Paris, she has gained prominence at major international film festivals and received numerous awards. Her short films often recycle and re-edit materials, such as online videos and film clips, to create new narratives. In an almost absurd and eerie manner, she critiques the image production and consumption spawned by the "attention economy" in our capitalistic society.

Due to the limited length and scope of the article, I unfortunately have to leave out some in-depth discussions and many artists who are actively creating and thinking. While considering “woman-as-an-idenity” can be an advantage and an opportunity, it can also become a constraint. Therefore, it is essential to return to the ontology and individulaity of each artist to truly understand and interpret their creative practices. More crucially, the younger generation of artists has begun to engage in profound reflections on their gender and the binary nature of gender. The understanding of their own gender is often multifaceted, no longer easily fitting into the traditional categories of male or female. This ongoing reflection and discussion on diversity and multiplicity will undoubtedly form a critical foundation for the future development of art, philosophy, and technology. (Translated by Zhao Wenrui)

翁笑雨,常驻纽约的独立策展人和写作者。她的策展和写作实践关注全球化、身份和后殖民等议题,同时注重与艺术家、科学家、研究者和哲学家的深入跨学科合作,构造综合、多层次、互动迭递的语境和平台。翁笑雨毕业于中央美术学院和加州艺术学院。她曾任位于多伦多安大略省美术馆的卡罗尔及莫顿・拉普现代和当代艺术策展人、部门主管。此前,翁笑雨是纽约古根海姆博物馆何鸿毅家族基金副策展人。任职期间,她策划了大型展览 “故事新编”(2016~2017)和 “单手拍掌”(2018)。她还策划了艺术家 Christian Nyampeta 在古根海姆的个展 “Sometimes It Was Beautiful”(2021), 以及第五届乌拉尔双年展 “永生”(俄罗斯叶卡捷琳堡,2019),后者于 2020 年被《艺术新闻 / 俄文版》授予年度最佳展览的荣誉。在过去 10 年间,翁笑雨在全球策划超过 30 个展览和项目。她近期的其它独立展览还包括:“非黑 / 非红 / 非黄 / 非女”(时代艺术中心,柏林,2019)、“Soft Crash”(贝加莫当代艺术中心,意大利,2016) 等。

翁笑雨曾担任卡蒂斯特(Kadist)艺术基金会(巴黎 / 旧金山,2010~2015)亚洲项目的主持人和策划人,她目前是该基金会的艺术顾问。作为一名作者和批评家,她也为各大重要艺术期刊、艺术家和美术馆撰稿。翁笑雨是第八届 Premio Lorenzo Bonald per L’arte Enterprize 国际策展人奖(2015)的获奖者,也是纽约亚洲文化协会 Starr Foundation 奖学金的获得者(2007~2009)。

Xiaoyu Weng is an award-wining curator and writer based in New York. Her curatorial and writing practices focus on the impact of globalization, identity, and decolonization, as well as the intersection of art, science, and technology. Most recently, she was the Carol and Morton Rapp Curator, and head of Modern and Contemporary Art at the Art Gallery of Ontario (AGO) in Toronto, Canada. Previously, she was The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Associate Curator at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York, where she curated highly acclaimed exhibitions “Tales of Our Time” (2016–2017) and “One Hand Clapping” (2018). Featuring newly commissioned artworks by thirteen artists and artist collectives, the exhibitions challenge myths of identity and nation-state constructions. In 2018–2019, Weng served as the curator of the 5th Ural Industrial Biennial of Contemporary Art in Yekaterinburg, Russia. The biennial was awarded the “Best Exhibition of the Year” by the Art Newspaper Russia.

Weng was the director and curator of Asia Programs at Kadist Art Foundation (Paris/San Francisco, 2010–2015). She continues to serve as a program and collection advisor for the Foundation. Weng has curated more than 50 exhibitions and projects internationally and has worked with over fifty organizations, three hundred artists and collaborators across all continents. She writes regularly on contemporary art and visual culture and has published widely in catalogues and periodicals.