在香特尔・阿克曼(Chantal Akerman)的电影《让娜・迪尔曼》(Jeanne Dielman, 1975)中,女主人公一遍遍穿行于家中,其步伐、动作、家务程序并入一套密不透风的流程:维持桌面、灶台、床铺的整洁,打理儿子的起居,或坐下削土豆、喝咖啡、读报纸。她是房子的主人,却被其中的秩序牢牢扣住。节奏一旦出现偏差,生活便迅速失衡。居所俨然是规训得以在日常中作用的结构。

但影片并未止步于对这种结构的揭示。阿克曼以固定镜头停驻在空间之中,让身体在画面框架中反复进出、运动⸺门框与狭窄长廊中的穿行、镜子里出现的身影、鞋跟敲击地面的声响、柜门开合的节奏、鸡毛掸子划出的陈列柜轮廓…… 在这些被反复执行的动作中,房间的尺度、路径与边界逐渐显形;身体也在适应空间的过程中,形成自己的节律与感知。

In Chantal Akerman’s Jeanne Dielman (1975), the protagonist paces her apartment repeatedly. Her steps, gestures, and domestic tasks fuse into a seamless routine: tidying the table, stove, and bed; tending her son; peeling potatoes, sipping coffee, reading the newspaper. She runs the house, yet remains trapped by its order. Even a small disruption sends life off balance. The home becomes a structure where discipline is enacted daily.

But the film goes beyond merely exposing this structure. Akerman fixes the camera in space, letting the body move in and out of the frame: threading doorways and narrow corridors, appearing in mirrors, heels striking the floor, cupboard doors swinging, a feather duster tracing display cabinets. Through these repeated movements, the room’s scale, paths, and boundaries emerge, and the body, attuned to the space, develops its own rhythms and perception.

《让娜・迪尔曼》由此揭示出 “居所” 的两种面向:一方面,居所是家庭制度与再生产劳动秩序得以落实的空间;另一方面,它也在身体的反复行动与时间的积累中,被一点点感知、塑形。也许正是这种张力,使得即便半个世纪过去,居所依然是许多女性艺术家不断返回的创作场域。本文所讨论的六位女性艺术家的创作,从不同层面回应并拓展了这一问题。

很多时候,对居所的思考来自艺术家最直接的日常环境与生命体验,因此关联着对个人身份与创作脉络的探索,并常在艺术生涯早期开始。在 玛吉・李(Maggie Lee)这里,“居所” 是一座房子⸺妈妈突然过世,她不得不回到曾经逃离的新泽西郊区,准备清空售卖童年居住过的房子。而《妈咪》(Mommy,2015)就是艺术家对这场清理与告别做出的影像回应。她在访谈中说起创作的动机:“我想重现住在新泽西时的那种感觉,把它们拍下来。这样在离开我的生活、离开童年的家之前,我还能留下些什么。我会在每个房间里睡一觉,重新感受那些情绪,再把它们放进影像里。” 1

Footnotes

  1. Whitney Mallett:《玛吉・李的〈妈咪〉:一部关于失去父母的、令人震撼且细腻入微的纪录片》,Vice,2015 年。https://www.vice.com/en/article/maggie-lees-mommy-is-a-devastating-nuanced-documentary-about-losing-your-parents-111/ ↩

Jeanne Dielman exposes two faces of the home. It enforces family systems and reproductive labor order, yet it is also gradually shaped and sensed through repeated bodily actions over time. This tension may explain why, half a century on, the home remains a recurring site of exploration for many women artists. The six artists discussed here engage with—and expand upon—this question from diverse perspectives.

Reflections on the home often stem from an artist’s immediate surroundings and lived experience, intertwining questions of personal identity with the shaping of a creative trajectory, and tend to emerge early in an artistic career. For Maggie Lee, “home” is a house. After her mother’s sudden death, she returns to the New Jersey suburb she once escaped, to clear out and sell the house of her childhood. Mommy (2015) emerges as her cinematic response to this act of clearing and farewell. She described her motivation in an interview: “I wanted to recreate all these feelings I had while living in New Jersey. I wanted to film it so I could have it in some way before I had to leave my life and my childhood home. I would sleep in every room and recreate these feelings and put them in the movie.” 1

Footnotes

  1. Whitney Mallett, “Maggie Lee’s ‘Mommy’ Is a Devastating, Nuanced Documentary About Losing Your Parents,” Vice, 2015. https://www.vice.com/en/article/maggie-lees-mommy-is-a-devastating-nuanced-documentary-about-losing-your-parents-111/ ↩

如同一本精灵古怪的家庭剪贴本,《妈咪》由老照片、家庭 DV 影像片段、日记、简易动画拼接而成。千禧年风格的贴纸、亮片、星星在母亲生前积存的物品间闪烁、蹦跶。动感音乐与青春呓语交叠⸺“tears!” “smiley face!” 在鬼畜般的节奏中响起,情感流动真挚而混乱。跳切的影像与少女的旁白带我们回到她甜蜜又苦涩的童年。

艺术家手持摄像机记录下告别的过程:镜子中一次次哭泣的脸;擦拭、清洗、拆卸家具的动作以近乎失控的快进节奏展开。作为记忆容器的房子从此消逝,而影像成为回忆安家之处。母亲的故事得以栖身其中,女儿的自我书写也就此开始。

Like a whimsical family scrapbook, Mommy weaves together old photographs, home DV footage, diary entries, and simple animations. Millennium-era stickers, glitter, and stars flicker and bounce among the belongings Lee’s mother left behind. Upbeat music collides with adolescent murmurs—“tears!” “smiley face!”—repeating in a playful, almost frenetic rhythm in which emotion spills out raw and unruly. Rapid cuts and a young girl’s voiceover transport us to a childhood that is at once sweet and bitter.

Handheld, Lee records the act of farewell itself: her crying face repeatedly caught in the mirror; gestures of wiping, washing, and dismantling furniture sped to the edge of chaos. The house, once a vessel of memory, is erased. In its place, the image becomes a dwelling for memory. Within it, the mother’s story finds shelter, and the daughter’s act of self-writing begins.

玛吉・李用影像作别母亲及童年之家,韩倩 的实践则将 “居所” 放进更漫长的迁徙轨迹中。韩倩年少出国,反复搬迁使她对居住空间格外敏感。2017 年,在搬离巴黎住所之际,她用除尘滚筒缓缓划过房间的每一寸表面、每一个角落⸺墙壁、空书架、台面、地板⸺擦拭与扫描过去一年日常的轮廓,创作了《灰烬,一寸呼吸》(Dust, An Inch of Breathing)。2020 年 6 月,刚回到中国的韩倩将自己关在武汉家中房间十四天。1 日光穿不透被锡箔纸封住的窗户,除了门外偶尔传来微弱的声响,房内几乎感受不到时间的流逝。床尽头的红外相机记录下她重复的日常。艺术家在静默中与自己的思绪共处,一遍遍书写着回忆与梦境。回到故土,躺在并不熟悉却 “属于” 自己的房间,韩倩体悟着自身与家的距离。这段困居时光,既是一种对艺术家此前在家庭生活中缺席的弥补与消化,也是她重新与故乡和家人建立联系的尝试。

Footnotes

  1. 当时中国的防疫政策规定入境人员需居家或集中隔离十四天。 ↩

While Maggie Lee uses film to bid farewell to her mother and childhood home, Han Qian situates “home” within a longer arc of migration. Having left China at a young age, repeated relocations sharpened her sensitivity to domestic space. In 2017, as she moved out of her Paris apartment, Han slowly ran a lint roller across every surface and corner—walls, empty bookshelves, countertops, floors—tracing the contours of a year’s daily life in Dust, An Inch of Breathing. In June 2020, shortly after returning to China, Han confined herself to a room in her family home in Wuhan for fourteen days. 1Sunlight was sealed out by foil-covered windows; except for faint sounds beyond the door, time seemed to stall. An infrared camera placed at the foot of the bed recorded her repeated routines. In this enforced stillness, Han confronted her thoughts, writing and rewriting memories and dreams. Back on native soil, lying in a room unfamiliar yet nominally her own, she contemplates and senses her distance from home. During this confinement, the artist both processes her prior absence from home life and seeks to reconnect with her family and hometown.

Footnotes

  1. At the time, China’s COVID-19 quarantine regulations required all incoming travelers to undergo home or centralized isolation for fourteen days. ↩

沿着这条线索,韩倩又萌生了对家族迁徙史(尤其是其中女性长辈之经历)的兴趣。在《消失的路线》(Missing Paths, 2022)中,她走过连接家与祖父母旧宅的一段路;在《一日距离》(One Day Distance, 2024)中,她沿着祖母出嫁时曾走过的二十八公里路独行。在一遍遍的行走、重访与定位中,韩倩在一个个 “居所” 间摸索自己的位置。在建构创作路径的同时,她也逐步理解着自我与世界的关系⸺栖息之处不是一个稳定的内部,而是一串不断修改的坐标。

From there, Han turned toward her family’s migration history, particularly the experiences of women across generations. In Missing Paths (2022), she retraced the route connecting her home to her grandparents’ former house; in One Day Distance (2024), she walked along the twenty-eight kilometers her grandmother once traveled upon marriage. Through repeated acts of walking, revisiting, and reorienting, Han searches for her position across multiple “dwellings.” As her practice takes shape, so too does an understanding of her place in the world: home is not a stable interior, but a shifting set of coordinates, continually revised.

玛吉・李与韩倩的实践都从家庭与成长历程出发,试图在失去、迁徙与回返中探寻自我的位置,接下来的几位艺术家则将目光从个人经验推向更为普遍的时间与社会结构。

川内伦子(Rinko Kawauchi)关注居所承载的代际更迭与更广大的时间性。2005 年,她出版摄影集《Cui Cui》,收录了在祖父母家历时十三年的拍摄成果。“Cui Cui”,是鸟的鸣叫,也是自生命深处传来的声音,平凡又隐秘。远远近近的片段,带着柔和的光线与清透的色调,像是童年假期探望长辈时留下的零星记忆:缝补衣物的手、吃了一口的西瓜、准备入室的祖母、亮堂超市货柜间缓慢前行的祖父,院子里的花、屋檐下的鸟影、浴室的一角、天花板上的灯……

Both Maggie Lee and Han Qian begin from family and formative experience, exploring the self through loss, migration, and return. The following artists, however, turn from personal history toward broader temporal and social frameworks.

Rinko Kawauchi’s work focuses on the generational shifts and the broader temporality a home can hold. In 2005, she published the photobook Cui Cui, compiling thirteen years of photographs taken at her grandparents’ house. The title “Cui Cui” echoes birdsong, as well as a quiet voice rising from deep within life itself: ordinary and intimate. The images unfold in fragments, near and far, bathed in soft light and translucent tones. They evoke scattered memories of childhood holiday visits to elders: hands mending clothes, a half-eaten slice of watermelon, the grandmother about to enter a room, the grandfather moving slowly along bright supermarket aisles, flowers in the yard, birds beneath the eaves, a corner of the bathroom, a lamp on the ceiling.

川内伦子多使用双反相机拍摄,其定焦镜头与腰平取景使画面贴近日常的观看经验,视线保持在一种低位,叙事节奏平缓。然而这绝不是一本沉溺于私人情绪的家庭相册。通过精心的图像编排,一个普通日本家庭内部的生命轮回在翻页间展开:一页上,是蜷缩在草席上的祖母衰老的身体;对页,则是洗手池中新生儿的小小身形;下一页,婴儿清澈的眼睛与雪地里冒出的嫩芽相互映照。不论是棺中沉睡的老人、一颗针线球、荷叶上的露珠还是窗外的天气,都一一出现在同样的正方形画面中。屋内家族的生命与屋外的节令,生活中最平常的瞬间与大自然的宏伟紧密相连。将日常与自然并置,去等级化地编排微观与宏观,形成了川内伦子日后创作方法的雏形。

Kawauchi often works with a twin-lens reflex camera. Its fixed-focus lens and waist-level viewfinder create a perspective close to everyday vision, keeping the gaze low and the narrative rhythm gentle. Yet this is far from a family album drenched in private sentiment. Through careful sequencing, the cycles of life within an ordinary Japanese household unfold across the pages: a grandmother’s aging body curled on a tatami mat; opposite, a tiny newborn in the sink; then, the infant’s clear eyes mirrored by tender shoots breaking through the snow. An elder resting in a coffin, a spherical pincushion, dew on a lotus leaf, the weather outside—each appears within the same square frame. Life inside the home and the seasonal cycles outside, the most mundane moments and the grandeur of nature, are closely intertwined. By juxtaposing the everyday with the natural and leveling the hierarchy between micro and macro, Kawauchi sketches the approach that would come to define her later work.

家庭关系与日常生活同样是 出津京子(Kyoko Idetsu) 创作的主题。与川内伦子作品平静的气质不同,出津京子的作品以粗粝、直接的绘画表达照护劳动的身体经验。在《配料》(Ingredients,2018) 中,密密麻麻的食品配料说明覆盖了在超市采买的母子,黑色字体把人物夹在其中,就像育儿者的视线永远被营养成分、添加剂、过敏原信息占据。紧张的画面凸显了育儿任务所要求的持续警觉。

Family relations and daily life are also central to Kyoko Idetsu’s practice. Unlike the quiet tone of Rinko Kawauchi’s photographs, Idetsu employs a rough, direct painterly language to convey the bodily experience of caregiving. In Ingredients (2018), a dense list of food ingredients overlay a mother and child shopping in a supermarket; the black text presses in on their bodies, mirroring how a caregiver’s attention is constantly consumed by nutrition labels, additives, and allergen warnings. The tense composition highlights the relentless vigilance that parenting demands.

有时,出津京子用嵌套或错置的构图,将多个生活片段拼成复合场景,展现家务劳动的无穷无尽,衣食住行都是日复一日的磋磨:毛衣的破洞中生出客厅场景,速食餐的锡纸盘里出现独自进食的老人……《报酬》(Reward,2017) 中,一枚方正的 “报” 字占据整个画面,每一笔画的间隙中都嵌入一个育儿场景:汽车后视镜映出闹脾气的孩子、母亲怀抱哭泣的孩子飞奔、孩子额头贴着退烧贴陷入熟睡…… 家庭劳动没有间歇,没有报酬。出津京子常在画面中运用汉字、栅栏、树枝、房屋等结构,它们既形成构图的骨架,也是秩序的象征:文化规范、父权规则、人与人之间的隔膜。沿着这些框架,生活被一格一格分封。

At times, Idetsu constructs nested or displaced compositions, weaving multiple fragments of daily life into complex scenes that convey the relentless repetition of domestic labor. Clothing, food, shelter, and routines grind on endlessly: a hole in a sweater opens onto a living room; a foil tray from a ready meal holds an elderly figure eating alone. In Reward (2017), a bold, square Chinese character “报” (bao, “reward”) dominates the canvas. Within each stroke, miniature childcare scenes appear: a child having tantrum reflected in a car’s rearview mirror, a mother running with a crying infant, a child asleep with a fever patch on the forehead. Domestic labor offers neither pause nor reward. Idetsu frequently incorporates structural elements—Chinese characters, fences, branches, and houses—that function both as compositional scaffolding and as symbols of order: cultural norms, patriarchal rules, and social barriers. Within these imposed frameworks, life is compartmentalized, boxed frame by frame.

艺术家近年来的作品主题更为凝重。《洗衣机孔洞彼端的世界》(The World Beyond Through the Hole in the Washing Machine,2025)中,一个女人正在清理洗衣机,洗衣机管道则通向海岛上的尸骨。作品的配文中,出津京子提到了作家韩江的小说《不做告别》(We Do Not Part),指向济州岛被掩埋的血腥历史。就如同韩江在故事里将济州岛家屋的历史与 “四・三事件” 编织在一起一样,出津京子也将洗衣机的孔洞与历史的伤口连通在一起。家庭内部的规训与剥夺和国家的、历史的暴力共振。绘画让这种隐秘的结构显形,使 “家” 成为理解世界秩序的断面。

Her recent work takes on a heavier tone. In The World Beyond Through the Hole in the Washing Machine (2025), a woman cleans a washing machine whose pipes lead to skeletal remains on a remote island. In the accompanying text, Idetsu references Han Kang’s novel We Do Not Part, evoking the buried violence of Jeju Island’s history. Just as Han intertwines the domestic histories of Jeju households with the trauma of the Jeju April 3 Incident, Idetsu links the washing machine’s hole to a historical wound. Household discipline and deprivation resonate with national and historical violence. Through her painting, these hidden structures are rendered visible, making “home” a cross-section through which the order of the world can be apprehended.

年轻一代的中国女性创作者中,关注家庭内部暴力的也不少,薛萤 就是其中之一。她常以家用工具(厨房刀、刨子、锅子、勺子、梯子、抹布等)为材料,为父权制家庭与社会中积累的痛楚赋形。《没等父亲上桌,谁都不能动筷子》(That We Don’t Eat Until Your Father Is at the Table,2022)中,两片锋利的刀刃合而为一,将一块洗碗布钉入了墙壁 —— 柔软的织物与坚硬的金属缠斗在一起,父权的命令被凝固成悬置的威胁。在《疯狂妻子》(Crazywife,2022)里,一把用辫子悬挂的厨房刀不停地小幅抖动,撞击着地上的十字型铁锅,发出清脆的框框声,却始终在有限的半径内打转,好似家庭中反抗的循环。在《坠落》(Fall,2024)中,厨用刨刀一层层叠起,形成一架陡直向上的梯子,每一层都是带孔的刀片,锋利、磨损、锈蚀,引人心惊。这一堆叠不指向某一次具体的暴行,而是呈现出可怖的暴力总和。那些在家庭内部日复一日被消耗的时间、身体、情绪与生命,积聚为庞大却被视为理所应当的牺牲。正是这些看不见的劳动,支撑着父权与资本主义体系的运转。薛萤的创作将社会结构的形态具体化,揭示出家庭内部的剥削并非国家或资本暴力的附属,而是其最基础、也最稳定的组成部分。

Among younger Chinese women artists, many turn their attention to domestic violence; Xue Ying is one of them. Working primarily with household tools—kitchen knives, peelers, pots, spoons, ladders, rags—she materializes the pain accumulated within patriarchal families and society at large. In That We Don’t Eat Until Your Father Is at the Table (2022), two sharp blades are joined, pinning a dishcloth to the wall. Soft fabric and hard metal wrestle in tension, freezing patriarchal command as a suspended threat. In Crazywife (2022), a kitchen knife hangs from a braid, trembling in small, repetitive motions as it strikes a cross-shaped iron pan on the floor with crisp metallic sounds, yet remains confined within a narrow radius—a portrait of resistance caught in domestic cycles. In Fall (2024), kitchen peelers are stacked into a steep, vertical ladder. Each rung is a perforated blade, sharp, worn, rusted. The accumulation does not depict a single act of violence, but its terrifying sum. Time, bodies, emotions, and lives worn down day after day within the home accrue into massive, yet normalized, sacrifice. These invisible labors sustain the operations of both patriarchy and capitalism alike. Xue Ying’s work gives tangible form to social structure itself: exploitation within the family is not a subsidiary of state or capitalist violence, but their most fundamental and enduring foundation.

梁芝兰(Ghislaine Leung)对结构的兴趣,最初指涉艺术生产体系本身。通过精准的介入,她聚焦原本被忽略的关系、依附与劳动,让展览成为重新编排与检验艺术生产机制的契机。2019 年,在伦敦奇森黑尔美术馆(Chisenhale Gallery)的个展 “宪法”(Constitution)中,展厅墙面被刷上高光漆,使原本隐形的白墙在灯光下显露出日积月累留下的痕迹⸺层层叠加的油漆、钉孔与修补印记。员工通道中嵌入按英国住宅标准制作的黑门,让 “家” 的尺度渗入机构空间。

Ghislaine Leung’s early interest in structure focused on the systems of art production themselves. Through precise interventions, she highlighted the overlooked relationships, dependencies, and labor that underpin these systems, turning the exhibition into a space to reorganize and probe artistic mechanisms. In her 2019 solo show Constitution at Chisenhale Gallery, London, the gallery walls, originally invisible in their plain whiteness, were coated in high-gloss paint, revealing the accumulated traces of time—layers of paint, nail holes, and repair marks. In the staff corridor, a black door built to UK residential standards was installed, letting the “scale of home” seep into the institutional space.

成为母亲之后,“家庭” 真正进入了她的创作。梁芝兰以一段声明开启了 2022 年在纽约 Maxwell Graham 画廊的展览 “平衡”(Balances):“我觉得无法按要求完成新作品,因为我需要在晚上、周末,以及每周固定时间照顾孩子。我这样做,并不是因为我是艺术家还要‘兼顾’照护,而是我主动选择成为一名母亲。(…) 我想同时做艺术和照护,以此改变这个行业对身份与劳动的理解。”1 照护工作所需的工具与时间于是被直接引入展览空间,就像梁所说的,“我必须让身边的材料进来” 2:婴儿监视器实时播放画廊办公室的影像;门槛上安装儿童安全护栏;作品则只在她每周有限的工作时段中呈现,即周四和周五 9 点至 16 点之间。3 她激进地实践了真正重视照护的艺术理念:与其维持一种不允许杂质的创作纯粹性,赶走母职、生活琐事、经济压力,不如面对母亲与艺术家的双重身份,以及照护与创作劳动交织的现实,不将其视为创作障碍,而作为塑造作品的基本条件和材料。她的制度批判实践由此获得新的生命,并生长出建构的维度,像一套开放的结构规约。在随后的一系列实践中,梁芝兰将这一逻辑应用到执行层面:艺术家只提供简要指令,而作品的材料选择、形式与安装则由机构团队完成。作品不再完全服从于艺术家单一的意志,而是在关系、协作、误差与信任之中生成。她找到了一条在特定制度与生活条件下工作的道路⸺在艺术实践的同时承认生活,也在照护的同时探寻创作的可能。

Footnotes

  1. https://maxwellgraham.biz/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Balances.pdf ↩

  2. 梁芝兰,《Bosses》,伦敦:Divided Publishing,2023 年,第 74 页。 ↩

  3. 其余时间则被遮蔽,画廊照常向公众开放。 ↩

Motherhood brought “family” fully into Leung’s practice. She opened her 2022 exhibition Balances at Maxwell Graham Gallery, New York with a statement: “I feel unable to make the new works requested of me because I do childcare evenings and weekends, and weekly. I do this childcare not in spite of my work as an artist but as an active and empowered choice to be a mother. (…) I wish to do both art and care and in doing so change the terms of identity and labour within our industry.” 1The tools and temporal rhythms of caregiving were directly incorporated into the exhibition. As Leung put it, “I have to let the material that’s around me in.” 2Baby monitors streamed live footage from the gallery office; child safety gates marked thresholds; works were displayed only during her limited working hours, Thursdays and Fridays from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. 3Through these gestures, Leung enacted a radical, care-centered approach: rather than excluding motherhood, daily life, and economic pressure to preserve a “pure” artistic practice, she embraced the intertwined realities of being both mother and artist, of embodying both care and creation, treating caregiving not as an obstacle but as essential conditions and materials for her work. Her institutional critique is revitalized, taking on a constructive dimension—an open set of structural rules. This logic extended into subsequent projects. Leung provided only brief instructions, leaving choices of materials, form, and installation to institutional teams. The work no longer obeyed her singular will, but emerged through relationships, collaboration, contingency, and trust. In doing so, Leung arrived at a mode of practice grounded in specific realities of both institutional and domestic life: creating art without disavowing life, and exploring creative possibilities amid caregiving.

Footnotes

  1. https://maxwellgraham.biz/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Balances.pdf ↩

  2. Ghislaine Leung, Bosses (London: Divided Publishing, 2023), p. 74. ↩

  3. At other times, the works were concealed while the gallery remained open to the public. ↩

凯莉・莱卡特(Kelly Reichardt) 的电影《开展在即》(Showing Up, 2022)捕捉的正是这种处境:临近个展开幕,女主角的创作却不断被生活打乱,又从日常的缝隙里重新开始。坏掉的热水器、需要照料的猫、邻居的噪音、房东擅自进入工作室、家人朋友的需求…… 这些看似妨碍创作的瞬间,实则构成了作品发生的节奏与条件。创作不是在 “解决这些问题之后” 才开始的,而是在与这些问题不断纠缠的过程中生长。

回望本文提到的几位艺术家,可以看到她们都以不同的方式,处理着 “居所” 与创作的关系。居所不仅是家庭制度、劳动分配与权力关系的最小单位,也是一个容纳身体、塑造创作的空间。对结构的体察,往往依赖于身体在空间中的具体经验;而对空间与身体关系的探索,也不断触及家庭、社会与生产结构的框架。玛吉・李整理母亲的死亡和童年之家的丧失;韩倩在迁徙中摸索栖身的可能;川内伦子联系人类家庭与自然万物的循环;出津京子勾勒照护工作与国家暴力之间共通的框架;薛萤揭示家庭劳动与父权制资本主义之间的嵌套;梁芝兰则把家的时间和照护责任直接带进艺术生产制度内部。她们的工作并不在重申 “居所是女性空间”,而是关注居所如何承载回忆、日常、情绪、关系、劳动、秩序、制度和创作。女性生命体验与居所之间的独特连结,在她们的作品中回响。正如伍尔夫(Virginia Woolf) 在百年前已察觉到的:“因为女性在室内待了几百万年,她们的创造力浸透了墙壁。” 1(编辑:秋韵;翻译:郁祎)

Footnotes

  1. 弗吉尼亚・伍尔夫,周颖琪译,《一间只属于自己的房间》,天津人民出版社。 ↩

Kelly Reichardt’s film Showing Up (2022) captures this state with precision: on the eve of a solo exhibition, the female protagonist’s creative work is repeatedly interrupted by everyday life, yet it continually reemerges in the interstices of that life. A broken water heater, a cat needing care, noisy neighbors, a landlord entering the studio unannounced, demands of family and friends—these moments, seemingly obstructive, in fact shape the rhythm and conditions of artistic emergence. Creation does not begin once these problems are resolved; it grows through ongoing entanglement with them.

Looking back at the artists discussed in this essay, we see that each engages, in her own way, with the relationship between home and artistic practice. Home is not merely the smallest unit of family systems, divisions of labor, or power relations; it is also a space that holds the body and actively shapes creative work. Attunement to structure often arises through the body’s situated experience of space, while investigation of the body–space relationship inevitably engages the frameworks of family, society, and production. Maggie Lee processes her mother’s death and the loss of her childhood home; Han Qian searches for forms of dwelling through migration; Rinko Kawauchi connects family life with the cycles of nature; Kyoko Idetsu portrays shared structural logics between caregiving labor and state violence; Xue Ying reveals the nested dynamics of domestic labor and patriarchal capitalism; and Ghislaine Leung brings the temporalities of home and the demands of care directly into the mechanisms of art production. These practices do not seek to reaffirm that “home is a feminine space.” Rather, they explore how home bears memory, daily life, emotion, relationships, labor, order, institutional structures, and creativity itself. Across these works, the unique resonance between women’s lived experience and the space of home becomes palpable. As Virginia Woolf observed over a century ago: “For women have sat indoors all these millions of years, so that by this time the very walls are permeated by their creative force.”1 (Editor: Ara Yun Qiu; Translator: Yi Yu)

Footnotes

  1. Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own. ↩

张君出生于广州,现生活工作于巴黎。她在法国修读艺术史,研究亚洲艺术在欧洲的展览史,关注艺术创作、文化身份与当代艺术权力中心之间的关系。张君曾在巴黎当代艺术机构和画廊工作,同时也参与小规模、非商业、节奏较慢的创作实践。

张君的生活和工作环境,与成长背景差别很大。在日常生活中,她面对着语言、文化与制度体系中的隔阂。从这一处境出发,她关心人在陌生境地中如何建立生活,寻找语言,并特别关注源自跨文化、跨语言经验的创作。

Zhang Jun was born in Guangzhou and is currently based in Paris, where she lives and works. She studied art history in France and researched Asian art exhibition history in Europe, focusing on the dynamics between artistic practice, cultural identity, and the dominant centers of contemporary art. She has worked with contemporary art institutions and galleries in Paris, while also engaging in small-scale, non-commercial, and slower-paced artistic practices.

The contexts in which she lives and works differ significantly from those of her upbringing. In her everyday life, she contends with gaps in language, culture, and institutional systems. From this position, she is concerned with ways of building lives and finding language in unfamiliar contexts, with particular attention to artistic practices grounded in cross-cultural and cross-linguistic experience.